A project provides Pleiades with new coordinates for a place

<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>ala2004 43. Ampelius, father of the city, restores the 'palaestra'</title>

    <id>http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/redist/inscriptions/eAla043.xml</id>

    <author><name>Charlotte Roueché</name></author>

    <link rel="alternate" href="http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/inscription/eAla043.html">ala2004 43</link>

    <link rel="related" href="http://pleiades.stoa.org/names/aphrodisieus"/>
    <link rel="related" href="http://pleiades.stoa.org/places/638753"/>
    <georss:point>37.70832 28.71059</georss:point>

    <updated>2005-11-02T08:23:00</updated>

    <summary type="xhtml">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
            <h1>Ampelius, father of the city, restores the 'palaestra'</h1>
            <p>This inscribed text from Aphrodisias, found in the Bouleuterion/Odeon, on the stage rim, 
               can be dated to the mid 5th century.</p>
        </div>
    </summary>

</entry>

Comments

We interpret the presence of the following elements as an assertion, on the part of Roueché (the feed author), that:

1. this inscription relates to the place recorded at http://pleiades.stoa.org/places/638753
2. this inscription relates to the more specific coordinates 37.70832 28.71059

<link rel="related" href="http://pleiades.stoa.org/places/638753"/>
<georss:point>37.70832 28.71059</georss:point>

We know that the relationship of inscription to place is one of finding because it's a link to place. If the inscription mentioned a place by name, the link should be to a pleiades name record, not a place record. But how do we know what the <georss> element means? Is this intended to a be a "better" location for the place, or is it a more precise "place of finding" for the inscription? Or both?

What about metadata? Where are these coordinates coming from? Etc.