A primary source presented or cataloged by the project contains 1..n specific names cataloged in Pleiades

<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>ala2004 2. Honours for Cornelia Salonina</title>

    <id>http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/redist/inscriptions/eAla002.xml</id>

    <author><name>Charlotte Roueché</name></author>

    <link rel="alternate" href="http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/inscription/eAla002.html">ala2004 2</link>

    <link rel="related" href="http://pleiades.stoa.org/names/aphrodeisieus"/>

    <updated>2005-11-02T08:23:00</updated>

    <summary type="xhtml">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
            <h1>Honours for Cornelia Salonina</h1>
            <p>This inscribed text from Aphrodisias, found in the village (reused upright to serve as a wellhead, just north east of the theatre), can be dated to the period AD 253-260.</p>
        </div>
    </summary>

</entry>

Comments

We interpret the presence of the following element as an assertion, on the part of Roueché (the feed author), that the name recorded at http://pleiades.stoa.org/names/aphrodeisieus appears in the primary source identified by http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/redist/inscriptions/eAla002.xml.

<link rel="related" href="http://pleiades.stoa.org/names/aphrodeisieus"/>

But how do we know that <id>http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/redist/inscriptions/eAla002.xml</id> points to a primary source rather than a secondary source?