Allen Carroll (National Geographic)
- The power of placenames: Persian Gulf (Arabian Gulf). Had to change home phone number ... "the one issue that unites all Iranians"
- Society founded in 1888 -- transformation from gentleman's club to international media organization
- Mission and much of content = geography ... desire to organize all content by place therefore
- key assets
- brand: venerable and revered -- staleness a danger
- content: lots, but much is restricted by rights
- multiple outlets and distrib channels
- cartography
- storytelling
- goals for georeferencing project
- create infrastructure for organizing and accessing content geographically
- leverage for print, internet, mobile applications
- integrate with cartography
- create new ways to tell stories: spatial storytelling
- become "best source of curated, authoritative information about the world, organized and accessed geographically
- archival content
- challenges
- content archived by multiple divisions
- little or no consistency in databases and naming conventions (placenames)
- much/most content has poor location information
- new content
- goal
- deploy gps-enabled cameras and video equipment
- meanwhile seek temporary solutions -- placenames, addresses, descriptive text
- incorporate georeferencing into editorial and archiving workflows
- creating an enterprise gazetteer
- starting point: ngmaps placenames database = supports NG world atlas
- advantage: high quality and accuracy
- dis: 140,000 placenames (relatively tiny)
- currently associated with cartographic, not geographic attributes
- create a hierarchical structure based on standars and practices of existing online gaz svcs
- fine-tuned for special needs
- a single, primary display matched with spatial information (geometries), matching ng list against NGA and USGS gazetteers
- provide a strucutre for future retrieval
- harmonizing/crosswalking gaz with other divisions
- data hamrmony's thesaurus master software
- essentiallly done manually, vetted by library and and information svcs group
- tap Getty gazetteer for additional names
- combined total of more than 100K data entries
- parsing text
- likely to use MetaCarta?'s text parsing tools
- dynamic text parsing -
- geotagging, viewing and catalogin new content - also Red Hen systems (media server for visual media)
- cartography
- later phase: fully integrate the gazetteer with web-enabled cartobraphy (atlas matches what's online - and online all features are linked)
- meanwhile: incoroporating NG content into the MapMachine?, produced in partnership with ESRI
- goal: mapmachine becomes an alternate access interface to all ng content
- currently a pilot project
- strategy to lump/stack content into a manageable number of icons
- icons have numbers on them to indicate how much content
- mouseover gives you a summary by content type
- clicking gives you access to the full list
- you can filter out content types
- icons disaggregate as you zoom in -- function limited with archival data that is only grossly georeferenced
- spatial storytelling
- cartographic itineraries as a way to organize content into a narrative sequence
- why?
- make content visible/accessible/versitle for staff
- serve new markets (mobile/GPS?)
- form content distribution relationships to help diffuse geographic knowledge and make money
- integrate multimedia with cartography
- quality over quantity: authoritative/trusted data
- contact/credit to georeferences
- Jess Elder (jelder at ngs dot org)
- Anne Marie Houppert (ahoupper at ngs dot org)
- jessica Wdowiarz
- comment issues
- trust - how constructed/communicated
- authority - how/what?
- aggregative creation of gazetteers
- attribution
- corrections from the public - how managing (NG reacts to and uses "complaint letters" that come in, but they don't track these after they make the decision or publicly credit the individuals)
- annotation of provenance (pedigree of data)
- how do our formats and structures track and transmit this information
- reconstructing the ancestry of a particular piece of data
- trust derivse from transparency, so these are interrelated points
- GNIS tracks lineage
- where these 2 millions of names came from
- half came off existing paper maps (and from that you can get back to the original surveyor - if you go to the paper archive)
- other half came from an augmentation process dealing with "local authorities", which vary from state to state (state hierarchy of things)
- there are now formal arrangements with names authorities at state level
- their formality varies significantly from state to state
- contributor interface - geonames.usgs.gov
- what makes a name authoritative?
- just that somebody calls it that?
- or does it go beyond that?
- wordreference.com
- wiki-like chat area, where people can provide contextual use anecdotes
- aspect of authority: temporality
- it's also time-stamped in some way
- names have a time they originated
- they also have a cessation time
- like the spatial, time is a dimension along with placename disambiguation needs to occur
- NG's "de-facto" cartographic policy
- map the world as it is to the extent that this is possible, as opposed to mapping the world as someone wishes it would be
- but this is actually difficult
- NGA does capture and track lineage and analysis and decision-making in placename research
- data model takes this into account
- also temporality
- not currently exposed - on a case by case basis this information is available
Download in other formats: