A Historian's Perspective on Georeferencing and Interoperability
Ruth Mostern, UC Merced
- Digital gazetteers
- a structured dictionary of named places
- can be interegrated with network-accessible svcs to respond to queries and retrieve geometries
- valuable information resources in their own right
- and provide thte basis for place-based search, display and integration
- another perspective on place
- Yi-Fu tuan, "Place: An Experiential Perspective" (1975)
- place as a center of meaning, constructed by experience
- is it really true that gazetteers can't encompass all place information
- Yi-Fu tuan, "Place: An Experiential Perspective" (1975)
- Chinese sacred geography
- emei mountain in the foguang encyclopedia (secondary reference source):
- 5 lines of text in the entry that presents: 25 places named in a single entry, in addition to the headword; an additional 210 places on the mountain referenced by category (temples, peaks, etc.)
- how it describes it as a center of meaning
- location in political space
- alternate names
- neighboring topographical features
- constituent features (peaks)
- status in corporate group of Four Great Sacred Mountains
- significant named built features on the mountain
- other features referenced, e.g., 70 temples, 40 grottoes
- descriptive gazetteers as historical sources (a 13th century example), giving the history of a praefecture
- example: 2 new counties created in the praefecture in a particular year, addressed by name
- emei mountain in the foguang encyclopedia (secondary reference source):
- mapping the foguang encyclopedia
- implications for gazetteer design
- historical gazetters need to support content that is:
- multilingual (language, script, translation issues)
- temporally intricate (not just start and end date, but individual names have dates, individual footprints are temporally limited)
- spatially and temporally ambiguous
- richly attributed in textual sources
- reflective of indigenous ideas of space
- of diverse scale
- historical gazetters need to support content that is:
- perspectives on interoperability
- gaz as infrastructure
- integrating with, or using in, other types of systems and resources
- e.g., ecai work in the last year or so - linking who, what, where and when resources as a way into specific information about libraries' websites and other sources
- gaz and other knoledge organization systems ("time-ateers")
- an event (a state of being) is described by:
- title
- alternative names
- start and end dates
- attested dates
- location
- relationships
- bibliographic information
- creator
- an event (a state of being) is described by:
- single socially authored gazs
- a gazetteer environment that allows people to work
- multiple validated contributors with or without editor
- associated discussion site
- edited wiki (editorial control?)
- free-for-all wiki
- multiple fedeerated gazs
- rich with relationships
- most historical gazs will emerge as small, handmade, specialist artifacts - let's put them together!
- but ....
- incompatible typing schemes
- unmanageable ambiguity
- problem even in a single gazetteer
- what happens when the domain is multiple gazetteers that treat "the same place" but were altered and organized by separate authors
- conflicting authorities
- were the mongols a great civilizing influence or a bunch of barbarians?
- how to you "federate" a palestinian and an israeli gazetteer?
- challenge of achieving buy-in
- what's the academic and personal reward structure
- it's not just about making it easy
- gaz as infrastructure
Comments
- RF@NGA:
- NGA has many other databases that we do not think of as gazetteers, but in some way (this context) they really are
- relating places and events about places and keeping that in some kind of structured knowledge organizational system
- given that it relates to palce, we can apply the gazetteer paradigm
- ??
- context of inclusions (socially constructed gazetteers)
- emergency services: difficulty of separating the collective knowledge required wihtout compromising security and privacy concerns
- buy in is an issue here
- ??
- "unmangeable" ambiguity ... an objection
- ambiguity is complicated, but it's not necessarily unmangeable
- you have to research the ambiguity to figure out if you can mange it
- it's not necessarily the case that we can't manage it
- supposedly intractable situations may not be ... look first
- Bruce
- place ambiguity - you simply don't know whether it refers to one or another mountain
- those kinds of ambiguity are not fully tractable
- ??
- the "time-ateer" -- those types of ateers may be a way to get to a concept of the "minimal" gazetteer
- the "knowledge organization system"
- a gaz is one type of a more generic idea that is modeling and structuring information in some domain
- is this a genre?
- ??
- gazetteers are culturally grounded, and given if you can lie with maps, can you lie with gazetteers?
- what are the consequences for modeling
- how do you put an imperical measure on the cultural distortion
- in a historical context - fidelity to original sources and rich attribution (footnoting)
- you must indicate where you got the information and why you interpreted it the way you did
- a variation ont he trust issue, metadata is a touchstone issue here
- wider issue for later discussion: do we think the gazs we currently have have adequate metadata
- in many cases, they are argueably not rich enough in this regard
- ??
- disconnect between various disciplines that could contribute
- particularly with historical cultural gazetteers - it gets more qualitative and relationship-centric
- ontology is more attractive in this domain
- reasoning systems to support ontologies - but they seem to be generally confined to "practical" domains (context here is AI/CompSci)
- is there any such Knowledge Organization support technology that's actually been applied to a gazetteer
- ??: Natl Counterterrorism Center - an ontology that doesn't know enough about the linkages
- rich attribution for new pieces of information is critical
- every time a new linkage is created, they have to explain it in a rich way
- there is an old one
- police application systems that are about who did what to whom when where - solving crimes: events, places and relationships
- e.g., Cop Link
- ??: Natl Counterterrorism Center - an ontology that doesn't know enough about the linkages
- disconnect between various disciplines that could contribute
- RM
- thinking rigorously about relationships
- we know how to do attributes of objects
- how do we attribute the relationships so that we make them rich, interesting, consisten and useful
- a number of national mapping agencies are developing ontologies
- being very explicit using tools comeing out of ai research (e.g., OWL)
- they are not deliberately addressing teh gazetteere, but they are building up the ontologies of types and relationships for the database to which the gazetteers refer
- there's a lot of potential synchrony here
- ??@redlandsinstitute
- exploring these issues,w ith a focus on relationships between objects
- tortoise habitat management project - data includes images and text documents, as well as gis data
- have been using a gazetteer modeled after adl - but user community needs more than the gaz provides
- what's relationship betwen ontology and the gazetteer
- can in theory automatically generate and maintain the gazetteer out of the more comprehensive ontology
- ??
- are gazetteers infrastructure?
- functional decomposition fo the existing protocols to support a richer suite of services
- is it a matter of putting an individual gazetteer into an atlas system - all custom-built stuff - a differnet question from Greg's use scenarios
- how do we think locally and build globally?
- are gazetteers infrastructure?
